yet at the same time things are not impermanent. How is that that all things are not divided, yet at the same time not one etc. etc. What is the problem with absolutes?
So what are things? is that the point, that there are no things to understand, things are empty of a true nature? if so then what is it that “holds” things together? or is it my grasping that prevents me from seeing the true nature of things, because I want to put
things into understandable concepts?
Where have I misunderstood?
Sorry for my bad english, not my mother tounge.

suggested reading:

Questions zen

yet at the same time things are not impermanent. How is that that all things are not divided, yet at the same time not one etc. etc. What is the problem with absolutes?
So what are things? is that the point, that there are no things to understand, things are empty of a true nature? if so then what is it that “holds” things together? or is it my grasping that prevents me from seeing the true nature of things, because I want to put
things into understandable concepts?
Where have I misunderstood?
Sorry for my bad english, not my mother tounge.

suggested reading:

Questions to a Zen Master: Practical and Spiritual Answers from the Great Japanese Master